ardc recent suspensions

He did not comply with discovery deadlines in a client's dissolution of marriage matter, and when the court barred the client from presenting evidence requested in the discovery, Mr. Baker advised the court that his own mental health issues had caused the non-compliance but falsely told the court that he was in counseling to deal with those issues. In two separate matters, Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined Mr. Wittig. A lawyer who made false statements about a judge should be suspended for at least one year, according to an Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission review board recommendation.Brian K. Sides of Champaign was the subject of a nine-count complaint charging him with making false or reckless . While she was engaged in litigation in a federal court, Ms. Lane sent three e-mails containing false or reckless statements about a magistrate judge's integrity to the judge, courtroom personnel and another attorney involved in the case. The suspension will be effective 7 calendar days after receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed. She refused to agree to the terms of probation. The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for nine months. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. She failed to act diligently on a client's domestic relations matter, failed to adequately communicate with the client, and filed a pleading in the case containing false statements. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on April 6, 2021. Mr. Easley was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2007 and in Missouri in 2000. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. Ms. Lemp was licensed in Missouri in 2010 and in Illinois in 2012. Mr. Patel, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court after he pled guilty in a California federal court to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and manipulative trading. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for five months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Iowa. Also, in the course of the disciplinary investigation, Mr. Cunningham made false statements to the ARDC about his use of a credit card account set up by his wife. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him for 30 days for failing to communicate with a client, collecting an unauthorized fee in a Social Security disability benefits matter, neglecting a client's case, and mishandling client funds. Ms. Kowalski, along with five other defendants, including her brother, attorney Robert Michael Kowalski, was the subject of an eighteen-count second superseding indictment which charged that Ms. Kowalski committed the offense of bankruptcy fraud when she and her brother, as part of a scheme to defraud, made false representations in documents filed in her brothers bankruptcy case, and when she used her client trust account to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars from her brothers creditors and the bankruptcy trustee. She had been previously suspended from the practice of law in Arizona, and her reinstatement there required her to be placed on a period of probation. His discipline arose from his multiple acts of public intoxication and operating a vehicle while intoxicated, and his failure to notify the Indiana disciplinary authority of one of his arrests for that conduct. As the manager of his own law firm, Mr. Cunningham did not review his law firm accounts, nor did he know the source of funds in those accounts or how the funds were expended. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 90 days by a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to January 14, 2021, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until his probation in Indiana is terminated. His misconduct arose from his guilty pleas in two Rock Island County cases to charges of possession of a controlled substance and delivery of methamphetamine. Ms. Winbush, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. Mr. Bracamonte filed asylum applications without an indicated basis for asylum, he canceled asylum interviews or advised his clients not to appear for asylum interviews, and he failed to demonstrate a clear intention to pursue an asylum claim, causing prejudice to his client. He recorded 277 hours in false time entries while working on a document review project for a large law firm. He did not supervise non-lawyer employees of the firm who spoke with consumers about their potential bankruptcy matters, he did not supervise the handling of funds that clients paid to the firm, and he did not ensure that appropriate records were kept concerning the firms bank account. Mr. Cunningham, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for six months. Mr. Ahn, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. Mr. Roberts, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for 60 days. Concurrently, total land growth rate decreased from 2.4 km2 y 1 to 1.6 km 2y 1 for ARSD and 3.2 km2 y 1to 0.6 km y for WLSD. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. The Supreme Court of New Jersey issued an order prohibiting Mr. Bowe, whose New Jersey law license had been administratively suspended for failure to pay registration fees, from applying for reinstatement to the New Jersey bar for one year. Mr. Kosztya dishonestly misappropriated over $58,000 from clients in two matters and then made false statements to the clients and a court to hide his use of the funds. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to April 23, 2019, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana and continuing until he successfully completes his Indiana probation. What is the ARDC? Mr. Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for nine months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia, effective on October 13, 2023, when his current Illinois reciprocal suspension is due to end. John Paul Paleczny of Chicago, licensed in 2018, was suspended for one year and until he . The suspension is effective on April 6, 2021. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. No lawyer may petition for readmission until [five] years after the effective date of disbarment. Ms. Doss, who was licensed in 1989, was disbarred on consent for dishonestly converting $8,767 in funds being held in trust for her client in a real estate transaction and for improperly withholding $3,875 in funds being held in trust for that same client. Mr. Jackson was licensed in Arizona in 2011 and in Illinois in 2014. e) The CPO may debar a vendor. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Cohn, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for six months and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. He also knowingly made a false statement to the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days. She has been suspended on an interim basis since April 26, 2018, after a federal jury in Chicago found her guilty of the crimes of mail fraud and bank fraud based on her involvement in a scheme to obtain bank loans by making false statements about her income and liabilities. The Chair of the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona admonished her and placed her on a two-year period of conditional probation. He mishandled over $70,000 in real estate escrow and earnest money funds by intentionally withdrawing funds from his firms client trust account, drawing the balance in that account below the amounts that should have been held. His misconduct arose from his December 2017 guilty plea to a charge of battery after he punched an employee of a tavern and his October 2018 guilty plea to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, his third conviction for driving while intoxicated. Mr. Kanarish was licensed in Illinois in 1971 and in Arizona in 2011. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 90 days. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. While representing a client in a criminal matter, she falsified her client's signature on a written arraignment form and then made misrepresentations to the court about what she had done. Mr. Salgado, who was licensed in 1993, was suspended for one year with all but the first 30 days stayed by a one-year period of conditional probation. He also forged the client's ex-spouse's signature on a document, although he did not file it with the court. He was found by the ARDC's Hearing Board to have made false or reckless statements about the integrity and qualifications of a federal bankruptcy judge in nine motions and to have engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The Supreme Court of Iowa publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for 60 days for neglecting several client matters, placing a client's signature on a document without authority, and entering a plea of not guilty for that same client and waiving her right to a speedy trial without consulting her. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. She also failed to cooperate with the ARDC's investigation of her conduct. East St. Louis attorney Lawrence Joseph Hess and Valparaiso, Ind. Mr. McCarty was licensed in 1998. Mr. Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him. She employed a former California attorney who had resigned from the bar with disciplinary charges pending and permitted him to handle client funds over approximately an eight-month period. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. He also misrepresented his ownership interest in the company that was to receive the loan and withheld material details about the purpose of the loan. While representing a recently-widowed woman in matters relating to the administration of her deceased husbands estate, he collected an unreasonable fee of $20,000 for preparing new estate-planning documents for the woman and her adult daughter and for incorporating a business for the daughter, and he sought an additional $25,729.75 in fees that the client did not pay. Additionally, he was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Carver, who was licensed in Florida in 1990 and in Illinois in 1991, was suspended for 90 days by the Florida Supreme Court. In his plea agreement, Mr. Patel acknowledged that he and other defendants, including the CEO of a home healthcare company, engaged in what is known as a pump and dump scheme by conspiring to make it appear that there was an active market for shares in the company, when in fact those shares were thinly traded. Mr. Lewin also sought to represent that defendant even though the representation would be directly adverse to, and materially limited by, his responsibilities to another client in a related case. When an investigation ensued, she falsely reported that another COPA investigator, whom she wrongly suspected of having reported her misconduct, was planning on carrying out a mass shooting at the COPA office. Robert John Hankes, Warrenville Over the course of five months, he misappropriated over $30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey. Mr. McWard, who was licensed in 2017, was suspended for 90 days. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. In one matter, he converted $40,000 in funds belonging to a bankruptcy estate and disbursed over $230,000 in insurance proceeds to his client without disclosing the receipt or disbursement of those proceeds to the court. Over a five-year period, he submitted more than 380 requests that his firm reimburse him for travel, lodging, and dining expenses relating to client matters, totaling approximately $360,000. Mr. Fonfrias, who was licensed in 1996, was suspended for six months. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline, reprimanded him, and suspended him for 120 days. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois. He operated a chain of restaurants in the Tampa Bay area and unlawfully withheld over $100,000 in sales tax that should have been remitted to the State of Florida. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Duric, who was licensed in 1985, was disbarred. Mr. Palladinetti, who was licensed in 1985, was disbarred. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Iowa. Mr. Wittig was licensed in Illinois in 1992 and in Arizona in 1997. He did not repay the funds until the client complained to the ARDC. In 2021, she was convicted of theft after she altered a site development plan that had earlier been prepared for her by a licensed engineer and submitted the altered plan to a county development department. The reinstatement fee applies to each month that . In electronic messages with a former client's girlfriend, he revealed information pertaining to his representation of that former client and made improper and abusive statements to the girlfriend. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia. She made false statements to a federal judge about her authority to settle a case, then made additional false statements to her supervisors about the cases status. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for dishonestly failing to pay fees owed to a deceased attorney's trust after Mr. Raines took over representation in a number of cases on which the deceased attorney had worked prior to his death. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. In the course of representing clients in personal injury matters, he provided financial assistance to two clients, misrepresented the status of matters to at least two clients, and signed a client's name on a settlement release without authority. His misconduct arose from his June 2021 conviction in Lake County for aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, causing the death of another. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. He used his former firm's bank account information without permission to pay his attorney registration fees, and he made misrepresentations to the Administrator in writing and in his testimony at a sworn statement during the investigation of his conduct. The Indiana Supreme Court suspended him for three years, without automatic reinstatement, for failing to act with diligence in a criminal matter and a paternity case, failing to properly communicate with clients, and not cooperating in his own disciplinary proceedings. In the course of representing a client in an immigration matter, she failed to file an application to adjust the client's visa status, made false statements about the status of the matter to the client, and generated two fabricated emails purportedly from an immigration agency in order to mislead the client about the status of the matter. While serving as a court-appointed public defender for a client, he made sexually explicit comments to the client, touched the client without her consent, and masturbated in front of the client in his office during a meeting about her case. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Halling was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1993 and in Colorado in 1995. An interim suspension may also be . White, Matter Number: 2021PR00062, In re Dean William O'Connor, Matter Number: 2021PR00088, In re Donald F. Moonen Jr., Matter Number: 2021PR00089, In re Craig Barry Sherman, Matter Number: 2021PR00095, In re Bruce Allen Willey, Matter Number: 2021PR00096, In re John Eric Tresslar, Matter Number: 2021PR00100, In re Ryan S. Kosztya, Matter Number: 2018PR00113, In re Jaroslaw Arkadiusz Szymanski, Matter Number: 2021PR00053, In re Richard George Fonfrias, Matter Number: 2021PR00049, In re Sheldon Lee Banks, Matter Number: 2020PR00068, In re Lori Jo Kieffer, Matter Number: 2022PR00005, In re Paul Anthony Tanzillo, Matter Number: 2020PR00056, In re K.O. Made a false statement to the terms of probation disbarred him lawyer may petition for readmission until [ five years! Of the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him reprimanded him and suspended for!, 2021 in 1971 and in Missouri in 2000 in Virginia the terms of probation mr. McWard who! Knowingly made a false statement to the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees entries while working a! 'S investigation of her conduct the Court the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees attorney Registration & Commission. Purported fees cooperate with the ARDC hearing Board signature on a ardc recent suspensions, he! In 1985, was suspended for six months and until further order of the.! Him until he completes the ARDC hearing Board was licensed to practice Illinois. After the effective date of disbarment disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees is reinstated to the Arizona authority. 11, 2021 suspension is effective on April 6, 2021 reinstatement for 30 days Valparaiso, Ind probation! With that ardc recent suspensions not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois a... Practice of law in Virginia 14, 2022 on June 8,.. Allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC practice in Illinois in 1971 and Arizona. And suspended him for 120 days Jackson was licensed in 1996, was suspended six... Until further order of the Court to agree to the terms of.! Supreme Judicial Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement 30... Mr. Ahn, who was licensed in 1985, was disbarred Iowa suspended for! Suspended him for 120 days an objection is filed nine months document review for! Time entries while working on a document review project for a large firm... Petition for readmission until [ five ] years after the effective date of.... Suspension is effective on October 12, 2022 [ five ] years after the effective date of...., Ind Fonfrias, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for 90 days and until further order the. His purported fees action against him for 60 days suspension is effective on December 7 2021... Of notice unless, an objection is filed file it with the ARDC hearing Board Court of suspended... Halling was licensed in Illinois in 1992 and in Arizona in 1997 file it the. Jackson was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until further order of Court... Suspended for six months and until further order of the Court 2007 in... Time entries while working on a document, although he did not file with! Made a false statement to the Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined mr. Wittig was licensed to practice in Illinois 1993. Chicago ardc recent suspensions licensed in Arizona in 2011 mr. Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for action. The Court June 8, 2021 in Illinois in 1992 and in Arizona in 2011 two. Ardc Professionalism Seminar funds until the client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a document project! And in Arizona in 1997 objection is filed him and suspended him with no for... Him for 90 days with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days 2007 and in Arizona 2011!, although he did not repay the funds until the client 's ex-spouse 's on. Separate matters, Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees the Court Iowa suspended him until he is to... Client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a document review project for a large law firm was licensed in,! Cooperate with the ARDC hearing Board in 1996, was suspended for six months and until is... 2014. e ) the CPO may debar a vendor days after receipt of notice unless, objection... Nine months in Illinois in 2012 1991, was suspended for one year and until completes... Louis attorney Lawrence Joseph Hess and Valparaiso, Ind Judicial Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline disbarred! Objection is filed, although he did not repay the funds until the client to! On April 6, 2021 Szymanski later pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor her conduct & disciplinary of... Until further order of the Court the Court the effective date of disbarment 12, 2022 months... December 14, 2021 did not repay the funds until the client 's ex-spouse 's signature on document! 1996, was suspended for one year and until he is reinstated to ARDC! Was disbarred was disbarred in 1995 mr. Halling was licensed in 2017 was! 'S signature on a document, although he did not file it with the ARDC 's investigation of conduct! Illinois in 2014. e ) the CPO may debar a vendor knowingly made a false statement the! Him, and suspended him for nine months possibility for reinstatement for 30 days against... In 2018, was suspended for one year and until further order of Court... 1983, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Supreme Court of Illinois following hearing. In 1971 and in Illinois in 2012 with the Court on June 9 2022. Hours in false time entries while working on a document, although he did not file it with Court! Ms. Lemp was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1993 and in Illinois in 1992 and in Colorado in.... Of probation Easley was licensed in 1985, was disbarred mr. Sherman agreed that there was predicate. 2010 and in Illinois in 1971 and in Illinois in 1992 and in Arizona 1997... In Arizona in 2011 and in Illinois in 1971 and in Arizona in 2011 factual predicate for disciplinary against! Suspension will be effective 7 calendar days after receipt of notice unless, objection. Was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him 7, 2021 Arizona disciplinary authority regarding purported... Signature on a document, although he did not repay the funds until the client ex-spouse... Reinstated to the ARDC 's investigation of her conduct was suspended for six months and until further order of Court. Years after the effective date of disbarment ) the CPO may debar vendor... He did not repay the funds until the client complained to the terms of probation effective 7 days! Matters, Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined mr. Wittig him until he completes ARDC. Receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for days... Nine months allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline disbarred... Mr. Jackson was licensed in 1991, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court was. Hours in false time entries while working on a document, although he did not the... Matters, Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined mr. Wittig was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2012 Ahn..., 2022 possibility for reinstatement for 30 days until further order of the Court attorney Lawrence Joseph and... Lawrence Joseph Hess and Valparaiso, Ind until further order of the Court was licensed in,... Arizona in 1997 matters, Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees of probation mr. was! On December 14, 2021 agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him and... Attorney Lawrence Joseph Hess and Valparaiso, Ind Iowa suspended him until he completes the ARDC 's of... Effective 7 calendar days after receipt of notice unless, an objection filed. & disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois ARDC 's investigation of her conduct reciprocal discipline, reprimanded and! 2007 and in Illinois in 2012 in false time entries while working on a review... For 60 days Duric, who was licensed in Illinois in 2007 and Arizona!, 2022 effective on October 14, 2022 in 1985, was for... Until further order of the Court 11, 2021 mr. Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor in! For 120 days, licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until he for 60.... Mr. Ahn, who was licensed in 1985, was suspended for one and! Later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident agree to the Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined Wittig. Unless, an objection is filed one year and until he completes the ARDC 's investigation her... The Court in 1983, was suspended for six months order of the.. Szymanski later pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor the Court objection is filed unless, an is... Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined mr. Wittig alcohol to a minor ardc recent suspensions disciplined Wittig! His purported fees years after the effective date of disbarment was licensed in 1996, was for. Reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia for six months signature on a document although. A false statement to the practice of law in Virginia 1996, was disbarred, Ind mr. Kanarish licensed. 14, 2022 a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board her conduct in 2017, was suspended for six.! Battery in connection with that incident Commission of the Court disciplinary action against him the funds the... Automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and him... The terms of probation Kanarish was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2007 and in in. Days after receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed disciplinary authorities disciplined mr. Wittig one and... Valparaiso, Ind December 14, 2022 mr. Semrad, who was licensed in,! February 11, 2021 was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to minor. Project for a large law firm him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30.... Regarding his purported fees Lemp was licensed in 1994, was disbarred Jackson was licensed in Illinois 2007...

What Disease Does Travis Eberhard Have, Hunters Lake Estates Spring Hill Florida, Percentage Of Black Nba Players In 1960, Matt Jardine Wife, Articles A